It can store and transfer energy between battery boxes. You remove it from the "Charge" slot in one box and put it in the "Discharge" slot in another. Other than that it's indistinguishable from a normal battery in regards to crafting and upgrading machinery.
[Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
-
- Member
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 12:37
- In-game: Maverick2797
- Location: Poking about here and there...
Re: Technic battery
The number you have called is not available during a solar eclipse. This message will self destruct in ten seconds in protest... [BEEP]
- PolySaken
- Member
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 05:18
- GitHub: PolySaken-I-Am
- In-game: PolySaken
- Location: Wānaka, Aotearoa
- Contact:
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
This is intended. Nodes with right click functionality will never execute it when sneaking.Maverick2797 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 27, 2020 16:03AFAIK there isn't any documentation on this feature. I came across it accidentally and found that nodes that contain formspecs (eg inventories) don't often show it if you right-click while sneakingSpoiler
whtemple1959 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 03:56Thank you so much for this information. Where is this type of information located as my searches found no reference about using the shift key to alter the behavior of the nodes/items or the screwdriver? The only reference to the shift key I have ever seen is in the instruction section of the replacer tool. So, with your excellent mentoring my farm now looks beautiful. Now if I can only find a way to start my farm robot automatically. Again my sincere thanks for your help.Maverick2797 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 13:08
Pretty sure you can rotate stackwise, itemwise and digiline injectors (not the self-contained, ejects down only) to point up or down by holding "sneak" (Shift by default) when right clicking with the screwdriver to avoid opening the filter form.
In general, left clicking has 4 directions of rotation (around a face,) right clicking has 6 (changes axis direction.)
Guidebook Lib, for in-game docs | Poly Decor, some cool blocks | Vision Lib, an all-purpose library.
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
TL;DR sneak-place allows building onto other nodes and not have their right-click callbacks executed.PolySaken wrote: ↑Sun Jun 28, 2020 05:11This is intended. Nodes with right click functionality will never execute it when sneaking.Maverick2797 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 27, 2020 16:03AFAIK there isn't any documentation on this feature. I came across it accidentally and found that nodes that contain formspecs (eg inventories) don't often show it if you right-click while sneakingSpoiler
whtemple1959 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 03:56
Thank you so much for this information. Where is this type of information located as my searches found no reference about using the shift key to alter the behavior of the nodes/items or the screwdriver? The only reference to the shift key I have ever seen is in the instruction section of the replacer tool. So, with your excellent mentoring my farm now looks beautiful. Now if I can only find a way to start my farm robot automatically. Again my sincere thanks for your help.
Wielding a non-node (eg a tool) will not be affected by this (which is why things like the screwdriver, etc work as intended).
I just recently posted an issue on github for minetest, about this very issue (right-click + sneak is ignored).
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10179
According to paramat and SmallJoker :
SmallJoker wrote: Don't wield a node to trigger that callback. sneak-place is reserved for nodes, thus mods should not use that to implement special functions.
paramat wrote: 'sneak-placing' a node onto another node without triggering a rightclick callback.
For example, the MTG chest where holding 'sneak' prevents the rightclick callback that opens the chest and so allows a node to be built onto a chest.
Many mods use the sneak-place feature to avoid the rightclick callback, so we cannot revert that commit, it would break a lot of mods.
Disabling a Nuclear Reactor
Hi,
How do you disable/deactivate a nuclear reactor? I have a couple of nuclear reactors on an online server i'd like to relocate but i'm not sure how to put them offline without causing a meltdown. I've tried in singleplayer to disable the core (and/or) removing the uranium rods, but in both cases i caused a meltdown.. so, what exactly is the correct procedure to deactivate the reactor?
How do you disable/deactivate a nuclear reactor? I have a couple of nuclear reactors on an online server i'd like to relocate but i'm not sure how to put them offline without causing a meltdown. I've tried in singleplayer to disable the core (and/or) removing the uranium rods, but in both cases i caused a meltdown.. so, what exactly is the correct procedure to deactivate the reactor?
Re: Disabling a Nuclear Reactor
bakkouz wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 15:50Hi,
How do you disable/deactivate a nuclear reactor? I have a couple of nuclear reactors on an online server i'd like to relocate but i'm not sure how to put them offline without causing a meltdown. I've tried in singleplayer to disable the core (and/or) removing the uranium rods, but in both cases i caused a meltdown.. so, what exactly is the correct procedure to deactivate the reactor?
I think you need to actually let them run their current cycle then dismantle them.
Also I would strongly advise you to make sure administration actually disarm these things from becoming time ticking world bombs. Since from my understanding there is permanent radiation AND Corium which will literally eat the server's world.
Even if no one causes a meltdown on purpose that doesn't stop a griefer from having a "dream" weapon just by causing reactors to have meltdowns. Eating the server's world in the process.
Re: Disabling a Nuclear Reactor
There is no proper way to remove a nuclear reactor once it is placed. (It will always meltdown when dug!)Mineminer wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 16:20bakkouz wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 15:50Hi,
How do you disable/deactivate a nuclear reactor? I have a couple of nuclear reactors on an online server i'd like to relocate but i'm not sure how to put them offline without causing a meltdown. I've tried in singleplayer to disable the core (and/or) removing the uranium rods, but in both cases i caused a meltdown.. so, what exactly is the correct procedure to deactivate the reactor?
I think you need to actually let them run their current cycle then dismantle them.
Also I would strongly advise you to make sure administration actually disarm these things from becoming time ticking world bombs. Since from my understanding there is permanent radiation AND Corium which will literally eat the server's world.
Even if no one causes a meltdown on purpose that doesn't stop a griefer from having a "dream" weapon just by causing reactors to have meltdowns. Eating the server's world in the process.
https://github.com/minetest-mods/techni ... or.lua#L12
Code: Select all
local burn_ticks = 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 -- Seconds
Code: Select all
after_dig_node = melt_down_reactor,
However, it doesn't matter because the nuclear reactor can never be dug once it is placed (without melting down).
A simple solution is to remove line 450 (above) [remove the after_dig_node definition] and that will allow
the reactor to be removed.
Re: Disabling a Nuclear Reactor
neoh4x0r wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 23:41There is no proper way to remove a nuclear reactor once it is placed. (It will always meltdown when dug!)Mineminer wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 16:20bakkouz wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 15:50Hi,
How do you disable/deactivate a nuclear reactor? I have a couple of nuclear reactors on an online server i'd like to relocate but i'm not sure how to put them offline without causing a meltdown. I've tried in singleplayer to disable the core (and/or) removing the uranium rods, but in both cases i caused a meltdown.. so, what exactly is the correct procedure to deactivate the reactor?
I think you need to actually let them run their current cycle then dismantle them.
Also I would strongly advise you to make sure administration actually disarm these things from becoming time ticking world bombs. Since from my understanding there is permanent radiation AND Corium which will literally eat the server's world.
Even if no one causes a meltdown on purpose that doesn't stop a griefer from having a "dream" weapon just by causing reactors to have meltdowns. Eating the server's world in the process.
https://github.com/minetest-mods/techni ... or.lua#L12
https://github.com/minetest-mods/techni ... r.lua#L450Code: Select all
local burn_ticks = 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 -- Seconds
You would need to wait for 604,800 seconds (in-game / real-time -- I don't know) but that's about 7-days.Code: Select all
after_dig_node = melt_down_reactor,
However, it doesn't matter because the nuclear reactor can never be dug once it is placed (without melting down).
A simple solution is to remove line 450 (above) [remove the after_dig_node definition] and that will allow
the reactor to be removed.
YIKES! Gotta apply such changes to the server promptly!
Thanks very much for caring to explain this to us! :)
[Mod] Technic Nuclear Reactor
What is burn_ticks the time for?
- Hybrid Dog
- Member
- Posts: 2835
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:46
- GitHub: HybridDog
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
The hv_nuclear_reactor_core_active does not have a on_blast, so maybe it is possible to remove it with TNT.
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
Hybrid Dog wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 21:07The hv_nuclear_reactor_core_active does not have a on_blast, so maybe it is possible to remove it with TNT.
Uh... I rather just nullify the code and call it a day. Stock reactors are just way to dangerous without tweaks like these or something else in it's place if your not up to "dumbing it".
- Linuxdirk
- Member
- Posts: 3219
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:21
- In-game: Linuxdirk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
Not going to use a nuclear reactor EVER because of all the issues it can cause :)
So I made this and might use it in the future.
So I made this and might use it in the future.
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
While I agree the stock settings and even that line item is absurd for any serious servers. Much of it can be disabled with standard settings (which is why they probably exists in the first place).
What's annoyed me more was the fact that I had to actually edited the code. Which server admins shouldn't be required to do. That's normally the modders' responsibilities to provide properly exposed settings for best practices. Despite it's not being a large or overly complicated code change.
- Linuxdirk
- Member
- Posts: 3219
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:21
- In-game: Linuxdirk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
Yes, but Technic is quite a mess. There are even things that can’t be crafted when some other mods are not enabled. It just silently fails (no warning, no alternative recipe, etc.). I highly doubt it would be possible to add options for disabling certain things without rewriting large parts of it.
- PolySaken
- Member
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 05:18
- GitHub: PolySaken-I-Am
- In-game: PolySaken
- Location: Wānaka, Aotearoa
- Contact:
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
Just use techpack /s
Guidebook Lib, for in-game docs | Poly Decor, some cool blocks | Vision Lib, an all-purpose library.
- Festus1965
- Member
- Posts: 4181
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 11:58
- GitHub: Festus1965
- In-game: Festus1965 Thomas Thailand Explorer
- Location: Thailand ChiangMai
- Contact:
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
easy for no meltdown - there are mods you just can switch a node to another ... nuclear_reactor_core replace with ... a Iceblock maybe ... and done
my solution, as less was, starting server just without the nuclear options, also easy do delete unkown_blocks ... even automatic
my solution, as less was, starting server just without the nuclear options, also easy do delete unkown_blocks ... even automatic
Human has no future (climate change)
If urgend, you find me in Roblox (as CNXThomas)
If urgend, you find me in Roblox (as CNXThomas)
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
I'm guessing that the wrench would cause a dig, but I am not certain.
A nuclear reactor can surely power a force field to keep itself safe as long as it is active. People creating one in order to grief is still a problem.
A nuclear reactor can surely power a force field to keep itself safe as long as it is active. People creating one in order to grief is still a problem.
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
A huge problem, since the world is literally eaten in the process while the Corium eats anything in it's path until the world is literally no more.
To a lesser but still a problem extent is the radiation.
Thankfully both of these are configurable, you just need to edit the code for the dig thingy though.
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
The corium flow is only going to eat downward to a degree, it won't actually eat the entire world, I believe.
I created a nuclear meltdown and tried to scoop up the corium source with a bucket while wearing a hazmat suit. Even with the suit, I still died before I could scoop up the corium.
It may be good for playability if there were a way to get near the source and scoop it up or if the source became chernobylite after a time.
Maybe make depleted uranium or something impenetrable to corium also.
I created a nuclear meltdown and tried to scoop up the corium source with a bucket while wearing a hazmat suit. Even with the suit, I still died before I could scoop up the corium.
It may be good for playability if there were a way to get near the source and scoop it up or if the source became chernobylite after a time.
Maybe make depleted uranium or something impenetrable to corium also.
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
I confused on what you means. I thought it's continuously changes directions eating anything in it's path. So unless it's just happens to go pass the world bordering before it done any serious damage isn't it just going to sit there and keep on moving around eating anything in it's path continuously?
- PolySaken
- Member
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 05:18
- GitHub: PolySaken-I-Am
- In-game: PolySaken
- Location: Wānaka, Aotearoa
- Contact:
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
You can turn off corium griefing, radiation damage and longterm radiation damage in config.lua, by the way.
Guidebook Lib, for in-game docs | Poly Decor, some cool blocks | Vision Lib, an all-purpose library.
- Linuxdirk
- Member
- Posts: 3219
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:21
- In-game: Linuxdirk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
Yes, that is the problem. you need to manually change upstream code. So you always need to manually merge your stuff when Technic is updated.
Configuration should NEVER be done in code but only by using the available configuration system.
- captenfalkonion
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 17:06
- In-game: captefalkonion
- Location: Germany
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
I want to build a nuclearreactor but i dont understand how i can get 3,5fissle uran?can someone tell me?
- Nathan.S
- Member
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 17:47
- GitHub: NathanSalapat
- IRC: NathanS21
- In-game: NathanS21
- Location: Bigsby Texas
- Contact:
Re: [Mod] Technic [0.4.16-dev] [technic]
Either cheat and use the /give command, or use centrifuges and get the uranium the hard way.
I record Minetest videos, Mod reviews, Modding tutorials, and Lets plays.
Check out my website, and brand new Minetest Modding Course
Check out my website, and brand new Minetest Modding Course
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests