Byakuren wrote:If I was going to implement them, why would I implement VAEs or dimensions in Minecore rather than in Minetest proper?
VAEs have been in the MT dev wiki TODO for years, we're very keen to add that, with that could come dimensions too since they are related. There's no reason they can't be done in MT, in fact there's more chance of these happening in MT due to the skills and knowledge of the core devs. Best not split talent on this, you could always port it over later.Scarecrowman wrote:Because we don't see how it can be done in MTE currently, also we want to keep all doors open.
I found it funny this was taken as a compliment, i see it as a concern, there has to be a balance, for example see the controversy over CSM. The balance is actually still in favour of players as is obvious if you chat with server owners.texmex wrote:I'd like to add to the conversation that the Minecore project seems to focus more on pleasing content creators and players than server owners for example, which sounds interesting.
We still don't have an effective serverside defence against hacked clients, and client-provided CSM (which was not a part of the original plan and was added too soon before server restrictions on it) has moved the balance towards players further, we're still trying to correct this balance.
I know that by 'players' you don't mean hackers, but the fact is a 'player-server' balance is inevitably about the ability to hack or cheat and server defences against that.