est31 wrote:The submission period has ended. These two entries have been submitted before the end of the competition:
--list--
Hashes for the versions of the entries of the time of the contest ended:
--hash--
Woah, only two submission? I thought there will be more than five submission!
est31 wrote:Both have been submitted within time, and fulfil the original requirement of a website for minetest, they have, as far as I can tell, all neccessary elements. Also, both have free licenses, as required.
Thanks!
est31 wrote:Technical comparison:
Both entries are responsive in the sense that they run well on mobile devices or devices with small screens.
Nice to hear!
est31 wrote:I have run both sites through the W3C mobileOK Checker, and both failed, already due to their size. While most what the checker complains about isn't very relevant in my opinion, its size metric is very useful. srifqi's entry had a size of ~260 KiB, which is less than Calinou's ~2.6 MiB. I don't think though that we need such a strict border of 20 KiB, its enough in my opinion if the website stays below 100 KiB.
Oh dear, it's too
big.
est31 wrote:1. srifqi's entry uses the Material Design library, and php. As it uses PHP, it doesn't run on github without tricks, like pregenerating the html locally, after every change of the php source. This is a big minus.
Umm... I was trying to build a simple API on PHP. Yes, PHP. I can't use others like, bootstrap, dokuwiki, and any other website builder, sorry. I know that it's a big minus.
est31 wrote:2. Calinou's entry is made in bootstrap, which natively runs on the target platform github.
That is a plus!
