I can fix it, but i don`t understand one: why developers can not bother for it if they are DEVELOPERS for this aim? As a result many users must issue the mods for it to improve it. I consider developers must make a initiative to improve the game as better as it`s really.TumeniNodes wrote:go into the default nodes.lua and change the "length" till you get the speed you like (the lower the number, the faster the animation..., higher number slows it down.)
It would be cool if the frame rate could be defined/altered from within the texture pack itself, with a quick little config fileCode: Select all
minetest.register_node("default:water_source", { description = "Water Source", drawtype = "liquid", tiles = { { name = "default_water_source_animated.png", animation = { type = "vertical_frames", aspect_w = 16, aspect_h = 16, length = 2.0,
About 0.4.17
- Andrey01
- Member
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 15:18
- GitHub: Andrey2470T
- In-game: Andrey01
- Location: Russia, Moscow
Re: About 0.4.17
- TumeniNodes
- Member
- Posts: 2943
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 19:49
- GitHub: TumeniNodes
- IRC: tumeninodes
- In-game: TumeniNodes
- Location: in the dark recesses of the mind
- Contact:
Re: About 0.4.17
but this seems to be more specifically related to individual taste/preference..., if development were to bend to this, it would go nowhere..., and fast.
It is not a development issue, honestly... there are actually numerous means to change this particular matter for yourself... I do not see how it is or would be an actual issue or bug?
It is not a development issue, honestly... there are actually numerous means to change this particular matter for yourself... I do not see how it is or would be an actual issue or bug?
A Wonderful World
- Linuxdirk
- Member
- Posts: 3219
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:21
- In-game: Linuxdirk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: About 0.4.17
And thus should be a configurable option (either within advanced configuration or on a per-texture basis).TumeniNodes wrote:but this seems to be more specifically related to individual taste/preference...
Re: About 0.4.17
+1Linuxdirk wrote:And thus should be a configurable option (either within advanced configuration or on a per-texture basis).TumeniNodes wrote:but this seems to be more specifically related to individual taste/preference...
Have a nice day! :D
- Otter
- Member
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 21:17
- GitHub: InfiniteOtter
- In-game: Otter
Re: About 0.4.17
I agree. The sandbox game is good, but it does not show the range possible.toby109tt wrote:The options above are not interesting for me the only thing I Want is a propper subgame game!
And a good mob api!
The parts are there to make a first person shooter. If we had a MinetestGrandTheftMarioCartDoom game, development on Minetest would stop for three months while we all piled in and played it. We need slopes and a bit of physics for race tracks, but apart from that we almost have all the parts. :)
Imagine driving through some of the cool cave mods while avoiding lava, tooling through villages and avoiding the minecarts crossing the road. On top of that, someone behind you is shooting at your tires and someone in front of you just released a grease spill.
- TumeniNodes
- Member
- Posts: 2943
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 19:49
- GitHub: TumeniNodes
- IRC: tumeninodes
- In-game: TumeniNodes
- Location: in the dark recesses of the mind
- Contact:
Re: About 0.4.17
Which I agree with but, there are only so many people, and so much they can doLinuxdirk wrote:And thus should be a configurable option (either within advanced configuration or on a per-texture basis).TumeniNodes wrote:but this seems to be more specifically related to individual taste/preference...
In my opinion, it would be great if some who would like to see such options avail, with gui scales / buttons, etc...
get a small group together, and work on it together...
Once the group has a polished, workable code and graphics, etc... then, present it to the devs.
The is so much going on, all the time, and it is really not a large team.
I am sure devs would be quite glad to offer any advice or help they could here and there... but might be even more glad to see such a serious community contribution.
A Wonderful World
- Linuxdirk
- Member
- Posts: 3219
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:21
- In-game: Linuxdirk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: About 0.4.17
Like the 160 pull requests for Minetest and the 18 pull request for Minetest Game? *scnr*TumeniNodes wrote:but might be even more glad to see such a serious community contribution.
Optionify all the things :)
- TumeniNodes
- Member
- Posts: 2943
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 19:49
- GitHub: TumeniNodes
- IRC: tumeninodes
- In-game: TumeniNodes
- Location: in the dark recesses of the mind
- Contact:
Re: About 0.4.17
But, rather than a bunch of individual PR's, people might try to work together, to create one solid, piece of code and then submit it as a working feature.
What has a chance of being merged more? hundreds of individual PR's in the same category... or one large, impressive work, which is well tested and adds a significant amount of feature rich user option gui?
A really nice, well build options gui with nice looking sliders and buttons, which works well is something I think many would like to see...
But to actually manage to get a small team together of people interested in this, to work together on it, and test it to death..., would probably stand a better chance of seeing it become a reality.
The dev team seems to be down to a skeleton crew... so those with the ability, to submit numerous pr's, should be able to get together to work toward one, big, polished pr
This goes for a graphics settings gui, mobs api, etc.....
What has a chance of being merged more? hundreds of individual PR's in the same category... or one large, impressive work, which is well tested and adds a significant amount of feature rich user option gui?
A really nice, well build options gui with nice looking sliders and buttons, which works well is something I think many would like to see...
But to actually manage to get a small team together of people interested in this, to work together on it, and test it to death..., would probably stand a better chance of seeing it become a reality.
The dev team seems to be down to a skeleton crew... so those with the ability, to submit numerous pr's, should be able to get together to work toward one, big, polished pr
This goes for a graphics settings gui, mobs api, etc.....
A Wonderful World
-
- Member
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 22:51
- GitHub: BBmine
- IRC: BBmine
- In-game: Baggins
- Location: USA
Re: About 0.4.17
What I want for 0.4.17 is for me to work on the MT engine and content, and get my name in the credits xD
-
- Member
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 01:59
- GitHub: raymoo
- IRC: Hijiri
- In-game: Raymoo + Clownpiece
Re: About 0.4.17
The small ones have a better chance because nobody will want to do a code review of a big PR.TumeniNodes wrote:But, rather than a bunch of individual PR's, people might try to work together, to create one solid, piece of code and then submit it as a working feature.
What has a chance of being merged more? hundreds of individual PR's in the same category... or one large, impressive work, which is well tested and adds a significant amount of feature rich user option gui?
A really nice, well build options gui with nice looking sliders and buttons, which works well is something I think many would like to see...
But to actually manage to get a small team together of people interested in this, to work together on it, and test it to death..., would probably stand a better chance of seeing it become a reality.
The dev team seems to be down to a skeleton crew... so those with the ability, to submit numerous pr's, should be able to get together to work toward one, big, polished pr
This goes for a graphics settings gui, mobs api, etc.....
Every time a mod API is left undocumented, a koala dies.
Re: About 0.4.17
This can be changed in the minetest.conf add this linev-rob wrote:The water is too lazy to move faster, and the developers are loo lazy to make it move faster :-)Andrey01 wrote:New suggestion: i would like the water source flows more faster. It`s veeeery sluggish!
Good idea, though.
liquid_update = 0.25
- Andrey01
- Member
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 15:18
- GitHub: Andrey2470T
- In-game: Andrey01
- Location: Russia, Moscow
Re: About 0.4.17
It`s really funny, v-rob XD.22i wrote:This can be changed in the minetest.conf add this linev-rob wrote:The water is too lazy to move faster, and the developers are loo lazy to make it move faster :-)Andrey01 wrote:New suggestion: i would like the water source flows more faster. It`s veeeery sluggish!
Good idea, though.
liquid_update = 0.25
22i, the same some people have already told me above. But i want developers would fix it in next release.
-
- New member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 23:52
- In-game: LamboRacer
Re: About 0.4.17
I wanted to say I would like in minetest 0.4.17 to have animals built in, easy mac download, more items to craft, more built in plants to grow, game with less crashes ,and anything that will make this game better.
- v-rob
- Developer
- Posts: 971
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 03:19
- GitHub: v-rob
- IRC: v-rob
- Location: Right behind you.
Re: About 0.4.17
There shouldn't be any crashes. I haven't experienced any in normal playing. If it does crash, then it is a result of mods.
- Andrey01
- Member
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 15:18
- GitHub: Andrey2470T
- In-game: Andrey01
- Location: Russia, Moscow
Re: About 0.4.17
0.4.17 will pass. Wanting 0.5.0 next release instead that. In any case, some of developers declared me abput it long ago.Isaac Boots wrote:I wanted to say I would like in minetest 0.4.17 to have animals built in, easy mac download, more items to craft, more built in plants to grow, game with less crashes ,and anything that will make this game better.
-
- New member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2017 16:16
- GitHub: zombiegamescool
Re: About 0.4.17
i cant wait for minetest 0.4.17!
- rubenwardy
- Moderator
- Posts: 6978
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 18:11
- GitHub: rubenwardy
- IRC: rubenwardy
- In-game: rubenwardy
- Location: Bristol, United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: About 0.4.17
There isn't going to be anything in 0.4.17 apart from a few bug fixes. It's 0.5.0 you should be looking forward towilliam92 wrote:i cant wait for minetest 0.4.17!
- Andrey01
- Member
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 15:18
- GitHub: Andrey2470T
- In-game: Andrey01
- Location: Russia, Moscow
Re: About 0.4.17
Hmm... i thought 0.4.17 won`t be released. Do you know when will this version be issued?rubenwardy wrote:There isn't going to be anything in 0.4.17 apart from a few bug fixes. It's 0.5.0 you should be looking forward towilliam92 wrote:i cant wait for minetest 0.4.17!
- Andrey01
- Member
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 15:18
- GitHub: Andrey2470T
- In-game: Andrey01
- Location: Russia, Moscow
Re: About 0.4.17
Does anybody know when do developers plan to issue 0.4.17 officially?
Re: About 0.4.17
I don't know to be honest. Here you can see a bit of information about what has been done on 0.4.17 though: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/projects.Andrey01 wrote:Does anybody know when do developers plan to issue 0.4.17 officially?
Have a nice day! :D
- azekill_DIABLO
- Member
- Posts: 7507
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 20:05
- GitHub: azekillDIABLO
- In-game: azekill_DIABLO
- Location: OMICRON
- Contact:
Re: About 0.4.17
Wut, there shouldn't be any 4.17 or... how can you explain the 0.5-dev already exists? they said there won't be anyone, no?
Gone, but not dead. Contact me on discord: azekill_DIABLO#6565
DMs are always open if you want to get in touch!
DMs are always open if you want to get in touch!
- philipbenr
- Member
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 01:56
- GitHub: philipbenr
- IRC: philipbenr
- In-game: robinspi
- Location: United States
Re: About 0.4.17
@azekill_DIABLO: People can release a working development model in advance, which is what 0.5-dev is. 0.4.17-dev can also be a development version out at the same time as 0.5-dev. Just the 0.4.17-dev will be more mature than the 0.5-dev version will be. Things do not always have to move linearly when developing, especially since the minetest team is diverse and works on a lot of different things at the same time.
- azekill_DIABLO
- Member
- Posts: 7507
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 20:05
- GitHub: azekillDIABLO
- In-game: azekill_DIABLO
- Location: OMICRON
- Contact:
Re: About 0.4.17
Okay thanks for the explanation. But I still think it's a bit a waste of ressource because some people work on 4.17 and othe on 0.5-dev but at then end it will be one!
Gone, but not dead. Contact me on discord: azekill_DIABLO#6565
DMs are always open if you want to get in touch!
DMs are always open if you want to get in touch!
- philipbenr
- Member
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 01:56
- GitHub: philipbenr
- IRC: philipbenr
- In-game: robinspi
- Location: United States
Re: About 0.4.17
They will likely use the magical powers of git to move the parts of Minetest 0.4.17 into 0.5. There is a good reason that they are using the seemingly complicated platform they are. Its powerful and can easily manage versions of things, especially code. So don't worry about them wasting their time.
- TheGreatCoffeeKing99
- Member
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 23:42
- In-game: Coffee99
Re: About 0.4.17
Hi there,
I think, whether it will be implemented in 0.4.17 or 0.5, mobs are a must for this game.
There are several mob mods that seem adequate, and with some fine tuning (maybe a hostile or all mobs switch?),
mobs can make Minetest more alive. For right now it just seems so static. Adding mobs or maybe even NPC's
(although that seems a little complicated for right now) wouldn't take much work, and they could be in a different folder
than default (which really needs to get split up). Maybe we could have a built-in API so creators could make
their own mobs with ease.
The least you would need to do is bundle some mod like mobs_redo with Minetest Game.
That's just my opinion.
I think, whether it will be implemented in 0.4.17 or 0.5, mobs are a must for this game.
There are several mob mods that seem adequate, and with some fine tuning (maybe a hostile or all mobs switch?),
mobs can make Minetest more alive. For right now it just seems so static. Adding mobs or maybe even NPC's
(although that seems a little complicated for right now) wouldn't take much work, and they could be in a different folder
than default (which really needs to get split up). Maybe we could have a built-in API so creators could make
their own mobs with ease.
The least you would need to do is bundle some mod like mobs_redo with Minetest Game.
That's just my opinion.
Hi. I don't have any published mods yet.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests