WTF
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 19:59
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 20:01
Well done, comrade!
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 20:10
Yep.
I believe we got hacked.
I believe we got hacked.
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 20:13
i don't think so. probably just someone fooling aroundplayzooki wrote:Yep.
I believe we got hacked.
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 20:25
aaaah
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 20:45
good name for our project ...
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 20:58
wheeeeeezeeeeey
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 20:59
and im like all for ubuntu...
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 21:18
Is this why it was down?
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 00:05
Look Paint or GIMP to me.
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 00:08
Nope, that was what minetest.net looked like a few hours ago.Likwid H-Craft wrote:Look Paint or GIMP to me.
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 01:03
Dude, that's epic. Firebug is fun Can't we preserve that version? Also, 0.4.6? WTF?
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 02:22
In soviet russia, mese mines YOU!
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 03:38
Maybe it's because of this. xD http://youtu.be/afr_hkycJ-Q
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 15:08
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 17:22
Honestly, I find people's mental association of "open source", and free software by extension, with Communism... disturbing, though I know they're usually just joking.
Free software (where "free" refers to freedom, not price) fits very well any libertarian philosophy, capitalist or socialist. On the libertarian socialist/anarcho-communist side, freedom with software allows people to cooperate on software development. But on the right libertarian/anarcho-capitalist side, free software creates a free market of support; if you have a problem which needs to be solved right away, you can pay any programmer to fix the problem.
Many people associate "communism" not with Libertarian or anarchist communism (which is more like Karl Marx's definition of communism), but with the authoritarian socialist systems adopted by the Soviet Union, China, and North Korea. Such authoritarian systems are not at all like free software. Quite the opposite; they are most similar to nonfree software, and a lot of the behavior exhibited by nonfree software is even somewhat similar to behaviors exhibited by authoritarian regimes (in particular, spying on the users and using malicious features to control your computing).
I do hope that there isn't too significant a number of people who ignore free software because they've heard of it being described (if only jokingly) as "communist".
Free software (where "free" refers to freedom, not price) fits very well any libertarian philosophy, capitalist or socialist. On the libertarian socialist/anarcho-communist side, freedom with software allows people to cooperate on software development. But on the right libertarian/anarcho-capitalist side, free software creates a free market of support; if you have a problem which needs to be solved right away, you can pay any programmer to fix the problem.
Many people associate "communism" not with Libertarian or anarchist communism (which is more like Karl Marx's definition of communism), but with the authoritarian socialist systems adopted by the Soviet Union, China, and North Korea. Such authoritarian systems are not at all like free software. Quite the opposite; they are most similar to nonfree software, and a lot of the behavior exhibited by nonfree software is even somewhat similar to behaviors exhibited by authoritarian regimes (in particular, spying on the users and using malicious features to control your computing).
I do hope that there isn't too significant a number of people who ignore free software because they've heard of it being described (if only jokingly) as "communist".
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 18:29
IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN COMMUNISTEST