The Extra Credits series
Explorers, Socializers, Killers, Achievers: Bartle taxonomy of player types
Drama, Game, Simulation: The Threefold model
Game design: resources, Q&A, opinions
Re: Game design: resources, Q&A, opinions
Previous discussions related to game design:
Graphics vs content
Graphics vs content
Re: Game design: resources, Q&A, opinions
From the previous thread:
I've heard of a mod that increase the strength of the mobs as you get further from the spawning point. That could work, assuming that the rewards are increased as well (in Mob Redo it seems possible to manipulate that way both the mobs' stats and the amount of items they drop; if you use Doom's dmobs that let you tame and ride dragons, players can also profit from this "megafauna").
It also seems to me that an "internal pressure" must exist that make players "flee" the spawning point area. Avoiding noobs can be one ;-), bragging about being able to survive easily in an area where all mobs are twice as strong can be enough of a reward for some. Resource depletion can be another motivation.
One achieves that not by making the game averagely difficult (for whom?), but my making the game easy at first and then raise the difficulty. That's a common recipe for video games. It might not be obvious to apply it to an open world game.[...] a player shouldn't ever feel that a game is too difficult or too easy, and they should create a "flow curve" of engagement.
I've heard of a mod that increase the strength of the mobs as you get further from the spawning point. That could work, assuming that the rewards are increased as well (in Mob Redo it seems possible to manipulate that way both the mobs' stats and the amount of items they drop; if you use Doom's dmobs that let you tame and ride dragons, players can also profit from this "megafauna").
It also seems to me that an "internal pressure" must exist that make players "flee" the spawning point area. Avoiding noobs can be one ;-), bragging about being able to survive easily in an area where all mobs are twice as strong can be enough of a reward for some. Resource depletion can be another motivation.
Re: Game design: resources, Q&A, opinions
A year ago duane made an update to nmobs that makes them more difficult to deal with as you get further from origin.Astrobe wrote: I've heard of a mod that increase the strength of the mobs as you get further from the spawning point. That could work, assuming that the rewards are increased as well (in Mob Redo it seems possible to manipulate that way both the mobs' stats and the amount of items they drop; if you use Doom's dmobs that let you tame and ride dragons, players can also profit from this "megafauna").
- "Mobs are now tougher, the farther they spawn from the center of the world. Mobs at the edges will have about five times the normal hit points and damage, and about 2.5 times the normal run speed."
Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Give a kid a fish, it's going to die.
- LMD
- Member
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 08:16
- GitHub: appgurueu
- IRC: appguru[eu]
- In-game: LMD
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Game design: resources, Q&A, opinions
The best games for Minetest are still the ones that are built for servers, such as rubenwardy's CTF. Therefore, KGM and I are currently creating Magic-CTF.
Re: Game design: resources, Q&A, opinions
Well, that looks more like an advertisement than anything.
> The best games for Minetest are still the ones that are built for servers
I don't think so. As soon as you go multiplayer you have to worry about protection, team play and server performance. The latter can have a severe impact: you don't want to shoot yourself in the foot and introduce game mechanics that require loads of computations per player and per game tick. This is actually quite limiting.
> The best games for Minetest are still the ones that are built for servers
I don't think so. As soon as you go multiplayer you have to worry about protection, team play and server performance. The latter can have a severe impact: you don't want to shoot yourself in the foot and introduce game mechanics that require loads of computations per player and per game tick. This is actually quite limiting.
- LMD
- Member
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 08:16
- GitHub: appgurueu
- IRC: appguru[eu]
- In-game: LMD
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Game design: resources, Q&A, opinions
The point is that every attempt I saw until now for making "smart mobs" "failed". In fact, the only interesting and smart mobs to beat are other players.
Re: Game design: resources, Q&A, opinions
AI is subject to the "uncanny valley" too: no matter how realistic you make the behavior of the mobs, there's always something that doesn't look right. It's convenient to only have "monsters" as enemies (as opposed to human-looking NPCs) because monsters can be dumb.LMD wrote:The point is that every attempt I saw until now for making "smart mobs" "failed". In fact, the only interesting and smart mobs to beat are other players.
PvP has its problems too. I remember when I played a Quake Arena -style game that sometimes I had to move to another server because the players there were way too good for me (there was no ranking system). So if you don't have a ranking system (and a player base large enough to make it meaningful at all), one would rather have some handicap/advantage system. For instance, one could reuse the RPG character class tropes (melee tank, weak ranged DPS, support, flanker...) and present player scores by class - assuming one makes it so that there's a clear hierarchy on how easy it is to play each class.
I'd recommend to play some Cube2:Sauerbraten on an instagib-CTF server. Sauerbraten in my view captures perfectly the essence of CTF because it is as simple as a game of this genre can be. Starting from the "simplest thing that can possibly work" allows for a better view on the features one adds: what problems do they solve? What problems do they introduce?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest