Transparency?

[NightCabbage]

Hi guys

I've just been thinking about transparency lately, and this engine was the first thing to come to mind

I'm wondering if you have come up with any solutions for having transparency in a chunk-based engine?

Depth sorting is all well and good, but when you're dealing with not just small objects, but large chunks of terrain, this technique falls down.

ie. Picture an object inside a chunk, where the front of the chunk covering the object is semi-transparent. The chunk effectively would need to be broken up, as part of the chunk is rendering in front of the object, and the other part behind.

Obviously the z-buffer doesn't cater for this. Pity they don't make a newer version of a z-buffer that supports transparency... (Not hard... I've come up with a pretty simple algorithm.)

So do you deal with this problem at all? Or just kinda ignore it, like Minecraft does

I'd love to see a solution that works for this type of engine

[PilzAdam]

So do you deal with this problem at all? Or just kinda ignore it, like Minecraft does

When you fly above clouds and look down at water then youll notice that the water is drawn in front of the clouds... so I guess we dont deal with it.

[hoodedice]

So do you deal with this problem at all? Or just kinda ignore it, like Minecraft does

When you fly above clouds and look down at water then youll notice that the water is drawn in front of the clouds... so I guess we dont deal with it.

I'm guessing problem with Irrlicht?

[Calinou]

So do you deal with this problem at all? Or just kinda ignore it, like Minecraft does

When you fly above clouds and look down at water then youll notice that the water is drawn in front of the clouds... so I guess we dont deal with it.

I'm guessing problem with Irrlicht?

Transparency sorting is a painful thing to do. It could be fixed, probably.

[Inocudom]

When was the last time that Irrlicht was updated?

[rubenwardy]

It is still in active development. The current version is 1.8.x, and Minetest uses 1.7.3.

[xyz]

It is still in active development. The current version is 1.8.x, and Minetest uses 1.7.3

That's not true. Minetest uses whatever is available. 1.8.1 is used for official Windows builds (at least those that I do).

There's no reason to stay on old version of Irrlicht, it may have bugs and whatnot.

[rubenwardy]

meh

[gsmanners]

Lighting isn't just painful for the devs, it's painful for your CPU. Every little bit adds up.

[Inocudom]

Lighting isn't just painful for the devs, it's painful for your CPU. Every little bit adds up.

Then shouldn't lighting be handled by the GPU instead? No need to rev computers like jet engines when an alternative is achievable.

[philipbenr]

Lighting isn't just painful for the devs, it's painful for your CPU. Every little bit adds up.

Shadows are currently not in the current version of Minetest, though I don't see why they shouldn't (apart from lag).

I agree with hoodedice here, and the thing is, current shaders can be turned on and off by just setting it up in the main menu or through minetest.conf. Now, I have no idea how hard it would be to make shadows in dev minetest, although I have seen some pretty cool things.
Edit: shadows doesn't have much to do with the current topic, but I think it is only appropriate to pull it up in unofficial engine dev.

[NightCabbage]

Yes, it definitely is a painful thing to do

It's especially painful with a chunk-based engine, in fact I'm not sure how you would even go about doing depth sorting.

ie. the example of an object in the middle a chunk with some semi-transparent blocks - instead of rendering the whole chunk, you'd need to render the back part, then the object, and then the front part. Nightmare!! lol

So I'm thinking that in the near future, I might develop an OIT (Order-Independent Transparency) engine. My main goal would be for games like Minecraft/Minetest, where depth sorting just isn't appropriate.

[sfan5]

It is still in active development. The current version is 1.8.x, and Minetest uses 1.7.3.

<what xyz already said>
1.7.2 is used for the official mingw builds (it keeps screwing up if I use 1.8)
[just FYI]

[gsmanners]

Yeah, but what about Linux? I ain't using no mingw.

/me looks at src folder...

Okay, I'm also using 1.7.2. I guess it's the stable branch.