Minetest 5.0.0 is on the road

User avatar
Andrey01
Member
Posts: 2417
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 15:18
GitHub: Andrey2470T
In-game: Andrey01
Location: Russia, Moscow

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by Andrey01 » Post

By the way, what does "-dev" mean in end of number of version? Unstable version or what?

User avatar
GreenXenith
Member
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 01:26
GitHub: GreenXenith
IRC: GreenXenith
In-game: GreenXenith
Location: The singularity
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by GreenXenith » Post

Andrey01 wrote:By the way, what does "-dev" mean in end of number of version? Unstable version or what?
"development" (unstable, yes).
Y▹uTube | Mods | Patre●n | Twitter | Minetest Discord | GreenXenith#3232

Hey, you. You're finally awake.
You were trying to view their profile, right? Found the rest of their signature, same as us, and that guest over there.

User avatar
sorcerykid
Member
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 15:36
GitHub: sorcerykid
In-game: Nemo
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by sorcerykid » Post

As I understand it, the "dev" tag refers to a pre-release that is ahead of the current stable branch, and is thus unstable.

What I find very confusing is why development on Minetest 0.5.0 isn't tagged as "0.5.0-dev", but instead maintains the version number of the previous stable release, 0.4.16.

User avatar
Wuzzy
Member
Posts: 4065
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 15:01
GitHub: Wuzzy2
IRC: Wuzzy
In-game: Wuzzy

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by Wuzzy » Post

GreenDimond wrote:
sorcerykid wrote:How did you download a Minetest 0.5 client? The core devs haven't even announced the release of 0.4.17 yet.
0.4.16-dev is the equivalent of 0.5.0 because of the breaking change. The player model change that paramat was talking about is already part of 0.4.16-dev. 0.4.17 may or may not happen.
@sorcerykid: That's becaue 0.5.0 is not released. Some idiots use the name 0.5.0 anyway. Which is wrong!

@all: Please do not use the version number “0.5.0” or any “stable” version number to refer to an in-development version, it's wrong and confusing as hell! (as proven by the previous couple of posts). Also, please do not invent version numbers out of thin air when they don't even exist.
Just wait until 0.5.0 is officially announced, only then it is valid.

The current in-development version is 0.4.16-dev and should only be called this way (or by its commit ID). Stable version numbers (i.e. without the “-dev”) should never be used for anything else but a stable release.

The “-dev” means that it can refer to any state of development (i.e. commit) after the stable version 0.4.16, but before the next stable release. “-dev” is not stable, so pretending that it is (by assinging it a version number of your own choosing, like GreenDimond does) is completely wrong!
The versions without “-dev” should only be used for the versions which got actually officially announced.

Long story short:
- Current stable version is 0.4.16
- Current developer “version” is 0.4.16-dev
- Any version with “-dev” is not really a version because it does not pinpoint any particular stage of development. Any commit between the previous stable release and the next stable release could be meant!
- Next stable version will probably be 0.5.0 (but that's not 100% sure)
My creations. I gladly accept bitcoins: 17fsUywHxeMHKG41UFfu34F1rAxZcrVoqH

User avatar
rubenwardy
Moderator
Posts: 6278
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 18:11
GitHub: rubenwardy
IRC: rubenwardy
In-game: rubenwardy
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by rubenwardy » Post

sorcerykid wrote:How did you download a Minetest 0.5 client? The core devs haven't even announced the release of 0.4.17 yet.
"0.4.17" should really be called "0.4.16.1". We are currently working towards 0.5, but will backport bug fixes to the 0.4 line. ie: "0.4.17" will be a fixes only release.

User avatar
ThatOneChris
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 19:54
IRC: ThatOneChris
In-game: ThatOneChris
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by ThatOneChris » Post

1337 wrote:Please put Minetest up on itch.io and Game Jolt!!!! PLEASE!!!

They both have awesome clients with easy installation and auto-update and a massive community between each platforms.
I don't think that'd be a good idea. Though both of those sites have decent clients and all that, but, I don't think they'd be good places to "release" the game, if a Minetest 1.0 is reached.

I personally would suggest either Steam, or, the Minecraft method, which is to just have the minetest.net website (Which already exists, simplifying the process.), and have the game available there.

Perhaps a launcher could be made one day, to provide updates? You know, if you were running on 0.4.15, using the (theoretical) launcher, either a notification could pop up telling you there's an update, or it could update automatically when you press "Play".

Just my opinion, I'm already fine with how Minetest works right now. Except the password system, I'm really hoping that can be improved some day.

hajo
Member
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:45
Location: DE
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by hajo » Post

paramat wrote:I've noticed people are making suggestions for 0.5, it's too late,
we already have a huge amount of work to do for 0.5,
I already posted a reminder with some old suggestions (mostly about ui, and the server-list).

Also, 0.4.16 still crashes when shift-moving stuff between inventories - is that fixed now ?

ABJ
Member
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 13:02
GitHub: ABJ-MV
In-game: ABJ
Location: In Earth orbit, with a perigee of 1048 km and an apogee of 1337 km and an inclination of 69 degrees.

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by ABJ » Post

Wuzzy, please don't use personal attacks.
That aside, you're right.
@paramat, that is awesome. Finally we can make dragon mods!

User avatar
paramat
Developer
Posts: 3691
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat
Location: UK

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by paramat » Post

GreenDimond wrote:
paramat wrote:old clients will not be usable with new servers (and the other way around).
Incorrect..
I can connect to the HOMETOWN server with the new client. It just bumps the player model/selection up by one block (just a visual change), and the F7 camera is offset.
The offset player is what i mean by 'unusable', no-one would accept playing MT with a vertically offset player.

User avatar
paramat
Developer
Posts: 3691
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat
Location: UK

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by paramat » Post

sorcerykid wrote:[Am I to understand that if a server owner updates to version 0.5, then they will lose players with version 0.4 clients? Similarly, if a player updates to version 0.5, then they will no longer be able to connect to any version 0.4 servers?

For the first few months, such an abrupt transition is sure to alienate many players. This impact would be most significant in the case of unofficial builds for mobile devices (such as Multicraft) for which a 0.5 compatible release could take months.
You understand correctly.

I see no alienation, some servers will continue to use 0.4 for a while, some servers will update to 0.5.0. Players can have 2 versions of MT to access both types of server.
We respect MultiCraft, but some of the other Android clients are either illegal, or lazy sloppy copies or scams, or bring problematic players to servers, we don't care much about those. Players can use the official MT Android app instead.
Many of the Android forks will be able to update to remain compatible and this might have the good result of killing off the more lazy ones.

0.4 to 0.5 is a big change and disruption is intentional, it is allowing us to fix and clean up some things. The disruption argument could have been used against 0.4 but 0.4 was a good move obviously.

ABJ
Member
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 13:02
GitHub: ABJ-MV
In-game: ABJ
Location: In Earth orbit, with a perigee of 1048 km and an apogee of 1337 km and an inclination of 69 degrees.

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by ABJ » Post

For when you can, make node properties changeable in game, please. This would open up a whole new realm of possibilities.

User avatar
Stix
Member
Posts: 1385
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 14:19
IRC: nil
In-game: Stix [+alts]
Location: USA

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by Stix » Post

Question: will sofar's entity_ai mod make an appearance in 0.5???
Hey, what can i say? I'm the bad guy.

User avatar
ThatOneChris
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 19:54
IRC: ThatOneChris
In-game: ThatOneChris
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by ThatOneChris » Post

One thing I'm actually hoping for in 0.5 or later versions is smoother player movement in multiplayer. It looks kinda janky at times, and is quite annoying if you're in a PvP situation or are just trying to keep track of where a friend is. I've seen it in lots of servers, so I'm not sure if it's a server problem or just the game, but I hope it's implemented if it is a problem with the game.

ABJ
Member
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 13:02
GitHub: ABJ-MV
In-game: ABJ
Location: In Earth orbit, with a perigee of 1048 km and an apogee of 1337 km and an inclination of 69 degrees.

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by ABJ » Post

I'm imagining that's one of the things client-side modding/official hacked client support was meant to fix.

nrz
Developer
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 17:16
GitHub: nerzhul
IRC: nrzkt
In-game: nrz
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by nrz » Post

i agree we should switch to 0.5.0-dev and 0.4.17-dev for both minetest branches, it's confusing to have 0.4.16-dev whereas 0.4.16 is released

User avatar
jas
Member
Posts: 593
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 18:15
IRC: Freenode
Location: IRC

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by jas » Post

* 0.5.0-dev
* 0.4.17

(Just my two cents;)

edit:
TumeniNodes wrote:Just a personal view, I honestly do not understand why anyone would use dev builds for a server, or personal use, unless they are involved with development, testing, or modding (but even for modding seems a bit senseless to me, as mods should be built for a stable system, meant for using on a stable system)
They don't call it Minetest for nothin'!

User avatar
Stix
Member
Posts: 1385
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 14:19
IRC: nil
In-game: Stix [+alts]
Location: USA

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by Stix » Post

can somebody answer my question? (its a few posts above this one)
Hey, what can i say? I'm the bad guy.

User avatar
paramat
Developer
Posts: 3691
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat
Location: UK

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by paramat » Post

Probably not, it still needs lots of work, plus we need to create the mobs themselves.

ThatOneChris, jumpy player movement is an inevitable result of network lag in multiplayer, it's not solvable, only by faster communication between server and client, so is an internet speed issue.

User avatar
ThatOneChris
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 19:54
IRC: ThatOneChris
In-game: ThatOneChris
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by ThatOneChris » Post

paramat wrote:Probably not, it still needs lots of work, plus we need to create the mobs themselves.

ThatOneChris, jumpy player movement is an inevitable result of network lag in multiplayer, it's not solvable, only by faster communication between server and client, so is an internet speed issue.
Seems to happen even when both me and a friend have great connection. I won't question it, though, it probably is connection speed.

Byakuren
Member
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 01:59
GitHub: raymoo
IRC: Hijiri
In-game: Raymoo + Clownpiece

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by Byakuren » Post

paramat wrote:Probably not, it still needs lots of work, plus we need to create the mobs themselves.

ThatOneChris, jumpy player movement is an inevitable result of network lag in multiplayer, it's not solvable, only by faster communication between server and client, so is an internet speed issue.
Jumpy movement is usually caused by network jitter and latency, both of which can be compensated for if the client sends higher resolution movement info and the client delays the application of position updates of other players (giving slack time to figure out how fast interpolation should be).
Every time a mod API is left undocumented, a koala dies.

User avatar
paramat
Developer
Posts: 3691
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat
Location: UK

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by paramat » Post

Yeah i'm no expert on network stuff so Byakuren is probably right.

hajo
Member
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:45
Location: DE
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by hajo » Post

Byakuren wrote:
paramat wrote:jumpy player movement .. result of network lag in multiplayer
network jitter and latency, .. can be compensated for
if the client sends higher resolution movement info and
the client delays the application of position updates of other players
In pvp-situations, that means you would get a much smoother display of how some other player
stabs you to death, outruns and evades you faster (because your reactions are slowed down :).

Would you prefer that ?

User avatar
rubenwardy
Moderator
Posts: 6278
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 18:11
GitHub: rubenwardy
IRC: rubenwardy
In-game: rubenwardy
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by rubenwardy » Post

Byakuren wrote:
paramat wrote:Probably not, it still needs lots of work, plus we need to create the mobs themselves.

ThatOneChris, jumpy player movement is an inevitable result of network lag in multiplayer, it's not solvable, only by faster communication between server and client, so is an internet speed issue.
Jumpy movement is usually caused by network jitter and latency, both of which can be compensated for if the client sends higher resolution movement info and the client delays the application of position updates of other players (giving slack time to figure out how fast interpolation should be).
The issue is that Minetest uses extrapolation not interpolation IIRC. With interpolation, the movement is considerably smoother unless the latency exceeds the sync time, which is usually 0.2s

Byakuren
Member
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 01:59
GitHub: raymoo
IRC: Hijiri
In-game: Raymoo + Clownpiece

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by Byakuren » Post

rubenwardy wrote:
Byakuren wrote:
paramat wrote:Probably not, it still needs lots of work, plus we need to create the mobs themselves.

ThatOneChris, jumpy player movement is an inevitable result of network lag in multiplayer, it's not solvable, only by faster communication between server and client, so is an internet speed issue.
Jumpy movement is usually caused by network jitter and latency, both of which can be compensated for if the client sends higher resolution movement info and the client delays the application of position updates of other players (giving slack time to figure out how fast interpolation should be).
The issue is that Minetest uses extrapolation not interpolation IIRC. With interpolation, the movement is considerably smoother unless the latency exceeds the sync time, which is usually 0.2s
Minetest uses interpolation for displaying player movement, it's just that the player positions are not timestamped or buffered so the game has no idea how fast to move the player.
Every time a mod API is left undocumented, a koala dies.

Byakuren
Member
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 01:59
GitHub: raymoo
IRC: Hijiri
In-game: Raymoo + Clownpiece

Re: Minetest 0.5 is on the road

by Byakuren » Post

hajo wrote:
Byakuren wrote:
paramat wrote:jumpy player movement .. result of network lag in multiplayer
network jitter and latency, .. can be compensated for
if the client sends higher resolution movement info and
the client delays the application of position updates of other players
In pvp-situations, that means you would get a much smoother display of how some other player
stabs you to death, outruns and evades you faster (because your reactions are slowed down :).

Would you prefer that ?
I'm not sure what you mean. A delay of 0.2s like rubenwardy suggests would only be a huge deal in something like a FTG, and any disadvantage is shared with the other player because you are both playing the same game.
Every time a mod API is left undocumented, a koala dies.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests