Stability of each mapgen

User avatar
paramat
Developer
 
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
Location: UK
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat

Stability of each mapgen

by paramat » Sun Dec 24, 2017 16:44

'Official stability' means we will not alter the terrain shape (that includes the structure of caves) unless it is unavoidable as part of a bugfix.
For non-mgv6 mapgens the biome system is separate and defined by MTGame, and is not stable, however changes are likely to be subtle and the worst that can happen is a few straight-edged biomes.

Mgv6 has been officially stable since 2012. Since mgv6 biomes are hardcoded into the engine the biomes are also stable.

Mgv7 terrain has been officially stable since 0.4.16 when it was made the default mapgen, however the optional floatlands (disabled by default) are not stable yet, maybe they will be for 0.5.0.

Mgsinglenode is obviously officially stable.

Mgv5, mgflat, mgfractal, mgvalleys and mgcarpathian terrains are not officially stable.
Last edited by paramat on Mon Apr 16, 2018 19:17, edited 1 time in total.
 

User avatar
Wuzzy
Member
 
Posts: 3095
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 15:01
GitHub: Wuzzy2
IRC: Wuzzy
In-game: Wuzzy

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by Wuzzy » Tue Dec 26, 2017 21:40

Thank you, this is interesting information, but how is this news? ;-)

Information like this needs to be written down in README files, documentation, etc. instead of scattering it in the forums.
My projects: MineClone 2. Hades Revisited. Help modpack. A ton of other mods, see here.
 

User avatar
paramat
Developer
 
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
Location: UK
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by paramat » Mon Apr 16, 2018 19:20

Updated to clarify that only 3 mapgens are officially stable.
 

User avatar
v-rob
Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 03:19
GitHub: v-rob

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by v-rob » Tue Apr 17, 2018 00:09

I find it funny how mgv5 was made in 2011 and it isn't considered stable. :)

Singlenode is stable?! *Gasp!* :P
 

User avatar
rubenwardy
Moderator
 
Posts: 5363
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 18:11
Location: United Kingdom
GitHub: rubenwardy
IRC: rubenwardy
In-game: rubenwardy

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by rubenwardy » Tue Apr 17, 2018 00:10

v-rob wrote:I find it funny how mgv5 was made in 2011 and it isn't considered stable. :)

Singlenode is stable?! *Gasp!* :P


The v5 we have now was made much later, around 2015 or 16 I forget. The original v5 was removed.
Core Developer | Donate | My Twitter | Mods | Mods 4 Android | Node Box Editor | Minetest Modding Book

Hello profile reader

LgiOxMFYXOqtqVqMPhbw1Bn3oNRvEC7j
 

User avatar
v-rob
Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 03:19
GitHub: v-rob

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by v-rob » Tue Apr 17, 2018 00:21

Yes, but it still uses the same noises (with a few modifications, I believe)
 

twoelk
Member
 
Posts: 1232
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 16:19
Location: northern Germany
GitHub: twoelk
IRC: twoelk
In-game: twoelk

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by twoelk » Tue Apr 17, 2018 14:14

v-rob wrote:Yes, but it still uses the same noises (with a few modifications, I believe)

rather, total rewrite to achieve the same effect
 

User avatar
Wuzzy
Member
 
Posts: 3095
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 15:01
GitHub: Wuzzy2
IRC: Wuzzy
In-game: Wuzzy

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by Wuzzy » Tue Apr 17, 2018 19:36

What exactly are the differences between the historical mapgen v5 from 0.3 and the current mapgen v5?

So far the only obvious difference I know of is usage of the biome API.
I believe the terrain shape is mostly the same. But is it identical?
My projects: MineClone 2. Hades Revisited. Help modpack. A ton of other mods, see here.
 

User avatar
paramat
Developer
 
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
Location: UK
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by paramat » Fri May 04, 2018 00:28

For mgv5:
Terrain surface shape is identical or as close as it can be. The eased 3D noise new mgv5 uses may create a slightly different shape to the original 3D noise implementation.
The 3D noise tunnels are identical in shape.
Old mgv5 only had these tunnels and had random water and lava sources added underground. New mgv5 doesn't have these sources, instead it adds the 'large caves' from mgv6, which often contain water or lava, these were considered a better way to include underground liquids.
Also there is an option (default enabled) for the giant caverns deep underground.

Of course, the biomes, ores and decorations are completely different.
 

Brian Gaucher
Member
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 01:56
GitHub: BrianGaucher
In-game: Brian

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by Brian Gaucher » Sat Jun 30, 2018 02:04

My question is.

When will mgv7, mgflat, and mgvalleys become stable?

Mgfractal will probably never be, given it isn't meant to be used in servers or for actually playing (mostly testing, proof-of-concept). And mgcarpathian is quite new.

Also, I think Minetest could have a tab that describes each MapGen. I still have no idea what they each are (other than fractal, flat and singlenode).
 

User avatar
paramat
Developer
 
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
Location: UK
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by paramat » Mon Jul 02, 2018 03:01

Mgv7 surface and underground is stable. The floatlands are not but they are disabled by default, they also seem quite well tuned so they might become stable at 5.0.0.

Mgflat in flat mode is stable. The only uncertainty about stability is the 'lakes' and 'hills' options but there seems no reason to alter those.

Mgvalleys and mgv5 seem near-stable. maybe for 5.0.0.

We're very hesitant about officially announcing a mapgen as stable because that is a big commitment that rules out certain types of improvement. However mapgens are often near-stable long before being 'officially' stable.
If you wait for official stability you'll miss out on good stuff for years. It's better to accept that very occasionally there may be a discontinuity in terrain.
 

hajo
Member
 
Posts: 586
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:45
Location: DE

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by hajo » Mon Jul 02, 2018 07:23

paramat wrote:Mgv7 surface and underground is stable. The floatlands are not
Mgflat in flat mode is stable. The only uncertainty about stability is the 'lakes' and 'hills' options

mapgens are often near-stable long before being 'officially' stable.
very occasionally there may be a discontinuity in terrain.

Would it be possible to detect such discontinuities ?

Eg. with a mod that gets called whenever new terrain is generated (and writes a logfile),
and another mod that keeps emerging more and more of the map.
 

User avatar
paramat
Developer
 
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
Location: UK
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by paramat » Tue Jul 03, 2018 20:19

A mod might be able to detect large flat walls running along mapchunk borders yes, and that mod could possibly also smooth the transitions.
 

User avatar
Krock
Developer
 
Posts: 3989
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 07:48
Location: Switzerland
GitHub: SmallJoker

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by Krock » Tue Jul 03, 2018 21:05

paramat wrote:and that mod could possibly also smooth the transitions.

Yes, such a mod already exists. However, detecting borders is slightly more complicated. It would need a on_generated callback which then loads the surrounding mapblocks to check whether there's a large change in terrain height in order to flatten it there. In addition to the height change, the biome might also have changed - which has then to be spread a bit to make the transition look acceptable.
It's much work to implement this - and the mod would cause additional lag for each new chunk to ensure a continuous terrain.
Mod Search Engine - Mods by Krock - DuckDuckGo mod search bang: !mtmod <keyword here>
 

User avatar
ExeterDad
Member
 
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 20:00
Location: New Hampshire U.S.A
In-game: ExeterDad

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by ExeterDad » Tue Jul 03, 2018 22:02

Krock wrote:Yes, such a mod already exists.

Whoa! How did I not know of this tool? Impressive videos!
 

User avatar
v-rob
Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 03:19
GitHub: v-rob

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by v-rob » Tue Jul 03, 2018 22:26

Krock wrote:Yes, such a mod already exists.


excessive flattening + trees =
+ Spoiler
Attachments
screenshot_20180703_152248.png
(684.68 KiB) Not downloaded yet
 

User avatar
paramat
Developer
 
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 00:05
Location: UK
GitHub: paramat
IRC: paramat

Re: Stability of each mapgen

by paramat » Sat Jul 14, 2018 19:01

I intend to have mgv5 and mgflat announced as officially stable for 5.0.0.
Mgvalleys is still somewhat of a mess, that i am slowly sorting out, so won't be for a while.
Mgcarpathian i might add a feature to (that has support from the mapgen creator), and is quite new, so again not for a while.
 


Return to News



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests