[16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
- texmex
- Member
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 21:08
- GitHub: tacotexmex
- In-game: tacotexmex
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
You can change Mojang’s art however much and it is still a derivative. And no, I can clearly see you just applied some filters, added some pixels and mirrored a few things. You need to draw your replica yourself from the ground up in this case for it to not be infringement.
-
- Member
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 18:18
- GitHub: Enrikoo
- IRC: Enrico - Enricoo - Enrlco
- In-game: Enrico - Enriko
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Add wieldhand of steve then it looks nicer.
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
great idea, now looks better, addedEnrikoo wrote:Add wieldhand of steve then it looks nicer.
Thats is not problem, my point of view is different.texmex wrote:You can change Mojang’s art however much and it is still a derivative
- texmex
- Member
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 21:08
- GitHub: tacotexmex
- In-game: tacotexmex
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
The point of view doesn’t matter in the eyes of law though but okay. You won’t be able to put this on Content DB.
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Havent checked, but i think i can. Your point of view is far from reality and law.texmex wrote:You won’t be able to put this on Content DB.
Now u can make your "Square" and sell it
- texmex
- Member
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 21:08
- GitHub: tacotexmex
- In-game: tacotexmex
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
ANY art deriving from unlicensed material will be rejected. I’m not arguing, I’m stating.
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Without proofs and examples its just "imho" (my too), nothing specialtexmex wrote:ANY art deriving from unlicensed material will be rejected. I’m not arguing, I’m stating.
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
The US Copyright law states that "it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports" (https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq- ... ml#howmuch) but the texture pack has none of these purposes so I think it's illegal?bosapara wrote:Without proofs and examples its just "imho" (my too), nothing specialtexmex wrote:ANY art deriving from unlicensed material will be rejected. I’m not arguing, I’m stating.
On mojangs page about "Brand and assets guidelines" (https://account.mojang.com/terms#brand) it says that they are "quite relaxed about other non-commercial things so feel free to create and share videos, screen shots, independently created mods (that don't use any of our Assets), fan art, machinima, etc." So using the textures is okay as long as you don't make money for it?
These two sources seem contradictory but since mojang doesn't directly cover the use of textures in their text I would abstain from using the steve texture just in case. owo
-
- Member
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 18:18
- GitHub: Enrikoo
- IRC: Enrico - Enricoo - Enrlco
- In-game: Enrico - Enriko
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Why didn't you list Vilja 2.0 hearts how I see in the image? It looks amazing.bosapara wrote:great idea, now looks better, added
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Alright, nice proofs. Later will create different qualitative character.Kroukuk wrote:The US Copyright law states that "it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports" (https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq- ... ml#howmuch) but the texture pack has none of these purposes so I think it's illegal?bosapara wrote:Without proofs and examples its just "imho" (my too), nothing specialtexmex wrote:ANY art deriving from unlicensed material will be rejected. I’m not arguing, I’m stating.
On mojangs page about "Brand and assets guidelines" (https://account.mojang.com/terms#brand) it says that they are "quite relaxed about other non-commercial things so feel free to create and share videos, screen shots, independently created mods (that don't use any of our Assets), fan art, machinima, etc." So using the textures is okay as long as you don't make money for it?
These two sources seem contradictory but since mojang doesn't directly cover the use of textures in their text I would abstain from using the steve texture just in case. owo
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Had some problems with it, now fixed and addedEnrikoo wrote:Why didn't you list Vilja 2.0 hearts how I see in the image? It looks amazing.bosapara wrote:great idea, now looks better, added
-
- Member
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 18:18
- GitHub: Enrikoo
- IRC: Enrico - Enricoo - Enrlco
- In-game: Enrico - Enriko
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
You can move your texture pack to https://content.minetest.net/. In the next version you can download minetest texutres, mods, games, clientside mods easilly.
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
You mean from 5.0 vers or 4.17?Enrikoo wrote:You can move your texture pack to https://content.minetest.net/. In the next version you can download minetest texutres, mods, games, clientside mods easilly.
-
- Member
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 18:18
- GitHub: Enrikoo
- IRC: Enrico - Enricoo - Enrlco
- In-game: Enrico - Enriko
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
The next version is 0.5.0.
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Dont know why, but import here doesnt work at the moment, will check later.Enrikoo wrote:The next version is 0.5.0.
-
- Member
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 18:18
- GitHub: Enrikoo
- IRC: Enrico - Enricoo - Enrlco
- In-game: Enrico - Enriko
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
One thing, the mese hoe texture is misspelled. Rename farming_tool_msehoe to farming_tool_mesehoe
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
thanx for info, fixedEnrikoo wrote:One thing, the mese hoe texture is misspelled. Rename farming_tool_msehoe to farming_tool_mesehoe
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
added new bubble
- azekill_DIABLO
- Member
- Posts: 7507
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 20:05
- GitHub: azekillDIABLO
- In-game: azekill_DIABLO
- Location: OMICRON
- Contact:
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
They are nice! Maybe they do miss a bit transparency but I can't really tell on the gif.
Gone, but not dead. Contact me on discord: azekill_DIABLO#6565
DMs are always open if you want to get in touch!
DMs are always open if you want to get in touch!
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Nothing transparency, just such lite colorazekill_DIABLO wrote:They are nice! Maybe they do miss a bit transparency but I can't really tell on the gif.
With transparancy its looks a little ugly
- azekill_DIABLO
- Member
- Posts: 7507
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 20:05
- GitHub: azekillDIABLO
- In-game: azekill_DIABLO
- Location: OMICRON
- Contact:
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
k :)
Gone, but not dead. Contact me on discord: azekill_DIABLO#6565
DMs are always open if you want to get in touch!
DMs are always open if you want to get in touch!
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Moon and sun added
- Attachments
-
- sun.png (6.8 KiB) Viewed 757 times
-
- moon.png (13.14 KiB) Viewed 757 times
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
the sun looks tiny
Last edited by Ektod on Sun Jun 10, 2018 22:20, edited 1 time in total.
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
- my settings of fov is "95"Ektod wrote:the sun looks tiny
- to sun added more shadows, its looks better than less, cuz more real
- we cant change size of the sun without change of the game code
___
just in case, real size of the sun, look sample:
Re: [16x] VILJA PIX 2.0 (modified by Jozet)
Update:
Shared chest and shop textures
Shared chest and shop textures
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests