.................... RAJ_INDEX _____
*#t.raj.closed* I suggest FEWER Backups, NOT More
***mt_raj_25*** *#t.raj.closed* YES to security...NO to cloud backups.
***mt_raj_26*** *#t.raj.inprocess* Introducing the Back em' up & Bore em' system.
***mt_raj_27*** .................... RAJ_DETAIL .....
***mt_raj_25***
Celeron55 said:
....."I'll be looking into implementing more frequent off-site backups to other servers ran by trusted community members."…
Recent forum and wiki downtime 2019-05-01...2019-05-03
I suggest FEWER Backups, NOT More
25.1.png
- ScreanShotOfSpreadsheet_revg
- (167.02 KiB) Not downloaded yet
___My Opinion___
- Code: Select all
_____Backups are a bitter sweet endeavor. I do have suggestions, despite the appearance I may be taking advantage of a tragedy (but so what if I am?).
I design and compile my offline spreadsheet into phbb code for EVERY post. Yes its time consuming. But I still have records of conversations to refer to.
The shortcoming of “MY” system is that it fails to read chronologically. That is, if I edit my post, it does not appear in a the order of forum conversation. I would like to get ideas on a chronological display of a single users single post within the context of a GROUP chat.
Losing 6 weeks of work in any personal sense is unnacceptable. Multply that by 1000 people and that makes for a big loss, even if its “only” a forum.
I have seen complaints about “MY” system (I use “MY” to distinguish from the norm, not as ownership). Say what you will, but if my posts are deleted, I have backups. As it is I havent posted recently so it has minor relevance.
A single post by user to handle the context of group topic discussions de-clutters the forum and provides for a primitive means of user backup. If fails chronological integration, but I hope something can remedy that.
I could have called it a "FLOG", the forum & blog. But that would make this a beginners guide to advance phbb flogging!
Will call this system "Borum". A forum and a BLog....and because it can bore 'em. (be boring)
Total system becomes the "Back_em_Up 'n' Borem" system.
___My Conclusion___
- Code: Select all
I propose the initiative to promote user level backups of posted data. Although large forum recoveries are obviously still necessary, the forums would not be “AS” dependant on mass backups.
The “Back_em_up_n_Borem” system is here for any to copy/paste/utilyze in a spreadsheet format.
I am not advocating everyone should, that would be absurd. I am very appreciative of the work many put into the forums, it has been an indispensable resource.
***mt_raj_26***
SorceryKid wrote:
"It is my understanding that the forum database contains private messages, hidden subforums, hashed passwords, and IP addresses. Even if fully encrypted, that's a lot of sensitive, personal information that is just begging for a privacy breach to happen. We've all seen the news of major companies and even government agencies in the line-of-fire for not properly protecting confidential data ;) In my view, nobody else except the core developers and moderators should be trusted with access to the forum database."
Recent forum and wiki downtime 2019-05-01...2019-05-03
Am I speaking a foreign language?
It's as if solutions to this problem consist ONLY of more frequent backups. It seems clear FEWER forum backups are desirable!!!
___My Opinion___
- Code: Select all
Exactly, I couldn’t agree more. Security MUST come first and foremost before convenience and lost time.
And so the solution that is suggested includes “cloud” backups? You have to be X!#$%**@* kidding me.
Losing 6 weeks of work in any personal sense is unnacceptable. Potentially exposing user data for exploitation….do I need to ellaborate?
If individuals care about the work they post, they need to back it up THEMSELVES. That way moderators and contributors can focus on other projects, not forum backups.
A single post by user to handle the context of group topic discussions de-clutters the forum and provides for a primitive means of user backup. If fails chronological integration, but I hope something can remedy that.
It appears I am attempting to create a forum in which each USer has ONE post per topic. ANd then within this ONE post, conversation is Biased to the USer. IT does not work well considering content is hidden within Spoilers. But Spoilers allow excessive amount of information to be minimized and avoid clutter.
Some smart people have identified the problems with backups and security. But they fail to identify a valid solution and instead suggest MORE backups.
***mt_raj_27*** Introducing the Back em' up & Bore em' system.
Or for those seeking violent alternatives, FLOG, for forum/blog.
___My Opinion___
- Code: Select all
Its a primitive yet effective approach to create bbcode templates.
Simply copy N paste your custom template into Minetest forum for an organized Single post alternative.
I am going to attempt to QUOTE my post in a different post. If it works as intended, that means anyone is welcome to copy and paste my post into a .xls spreadsheet.