just for those interested here is the latest rejected draft as far as I noticed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Minetest
discussion seems to be going since 2012
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... n/Minetest
there were way more, just can't find them at the moment
a warning!
just remember anybody involved with minetest should rather not edit anything in the article and this probably includes major forum posters as well.
By the way,
computer magazine articles that just describe the project with words that can hardly be distinguished from promotional material are never good sources.
Another by the way,
information from 'Computer Bild' is often not considered unbiased or reliable and as such often frowned upon as sole source for any information although 'Computer Bild' does have a slightly better reputation than the 'Bild Zeitung' itself.
I don't think there is a great conspiracy against Minetest as such, just a rather bad start and several misguided restarts by minetesters who cared and were thus disqualified regardless of the quality of information and minetest just never managed to get out of that corner of suspicious articles.
Promoting something while not allowed to look like promoting something is really difficult.
So people who want to promote minetest should by all means not touch the 'minetest on wikipedia' issue or even go near it but rather help to garner lots and lots of articles in relevant media. School projects or other educational projects for example need to be publicized as much as possible.