But 'santa' is avalible now.Razor wrote:I would like the santa clause one
/settexture santa
No, you can see admin and moderators in first post of this topic.aldobr wrote:"if you dont i will have you banned"
Pls whatever you do, make sure to clear up that information :
Is Neuro a moderator ?
Interact revoked.Neuro wrote:cactuz i need you to ban this person he is going around killing ppl because someone griefed his house and he didnt choose to report it, i told him to stop and you can see his response in the screenshot
I guess this is possible and I'm think this would be better camouflage than stone-skin.Neuro wrote:is it possible to make a clear skin?
But if everyone's skin goes to /settexture list, anyone can start to use your own skin and many people will have same skin. Isn't it better if everyone has own skin?cactuz_pl wrote:I guess this is possible and I'm think this would be better camouflage than stone-skin.Neuro wrote:is it possible to make a clear skin?
Here is the link to the transparent skin which I made.
Licence: WTFPL
Redcrab, I was thinking about our skin collecting, and came to the conclusion that it was better to add them to the public (/settexture) instead of assign them to players.
Well, yes. I agree with you Ade96. We'll see what redcrab say.Ade96 wrote:But if everyone's skin goes to /settexture list, anyone can start to use your own skin and many people will have same skin. Isn't it better if everyone has own skin?cactuz_pl wrote:I guess this is possible and I'm think this would be better camouflage than stone-skin.Neuro wrote:is it possible to make a clear skin?
Here is the link to the transparent skin which I made.
Licence: WTFPL
Redcrab, I was thinking about our skin collecting, and came to the conclusion that it was better to add them to the public (/settexture) instead of assign them to players.
I apologise for any damage done, and I will put it back. I understand why I was banned, and I understand that I was in the wrong to destroy the bridge & the pig. I did not mean any actual annoyance out of this and I promise it will never happen again. Again, I apologise, and if possible. could you please consider unblocking my account if you think that I am legible to play again.cactuz_pl wrote:Server is fine.irksomeduck wrote:Server is down
cactuz_pl wrote:Player 'irksomeduck' has been banned.
Reason: Greifing road and Insane's pig.
I know only about these two greifs but all actions of this player has been rolled back.
Edit: Original post.cactuz_pl wrote:
From now, every confirmed greif will be punish by ban.
Excuses such as:
- "Someone hack into my account and greif."
- "My friend played using my account greif."
Will not be taken into account.
You are responsible for your own accounts. Keep your passwords safe, don't share them. If someone greif using your account that's only your fault and your account will be banned for that.
Anyone can destroy a few buildings and then say "That wasn't me".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
So... I'm not getting my account back? P.S. I feel you did not make this clear enough. the rule is briefly mentioned 8+ pages back in the thread, and is not mentioned on the front page at all.cactuz_pl wrote:To Obiewan1111 and irksomeduck.
Edit: Original post.cactuz_pl wrote:
From now, every confirmed greif will be punish by ban.
Excuses such as:
- "Someone hack into my account and greif."
- "My friend played using my account greif."
Will not be taken into account.
You are responsible for your own accounts. Keep your passwords safe, don't share them. If someone greif using your account that's only your fault and your account will be banned for that.
Anyone can destroy a few buildings and then say "That wasn't me".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
New members that see this post, Keep in mind that you have to read EVERY SINGLE page for new rule updates. Uhh... This was 8+ pages from the initial first page, so if you want people to see this, then it should be on the first page. Plus, your quote just says about people saying it wasn't them. I am agreeing to destroying a few panes of glass, but no, I didn't grief. And I am generally sorry for this misunderstanding.cactuz_pl wrote:To Obiewan1111 and irksomeduck.
Edit: Original post.cactuz_pl wrote:
From now, every confirmed greif will be punish by ban.
Excuses such as:
- "Someone hack into my account and greif."
- "My friend played using my account greif."
Will not be taken into account.
You are responsible for your own accounts. Keep your passwords safe, don't share them. If someone greif using your account that's only your fault and your account will be banned for that.
New members that see this post, Keep in mind that you have to read EVERY SINGLE page for new rule updates. Uhh... This was 8+ pages from the initial first page, so if you want people to see this, then it should be on the first page. Plus, your quote just says about people saying it wasn't them. I am agreeing to destroying a few panes of glass, but no, I didn't grief. And I am generally sorry for this misunderstanding.
My criticism is that each rule should be clearly and concisely presented on the front page, so all new people are able to see it, like myself. Which was the wrong case..
Anyone can destroy a few buildings and then say "That wasn't me".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
"Ignorance of the law does not exempt from its application"
Acquittal would be fair to ignore the players who are in the first place, because without them, this server does not have to make sense.
Redcrab could you add "No mercy law" to the first page?
(If you agree with if, of course. If not, I will unban these players if you want).
I edit my first previous post.irksomeduck wrote:So... I'm not getting my account back? P.S. I feel you did not make this clear enough. the rule is briefly mentioned 8+ pages back in the thread, and is not mentioned on the front page at all.cactuz_pl wrote:To Obiewan1111 and irksomeduck.
Edit: Original post.cactuz_pl wrote:
From now, every confirmed greif will be punish by ban.
Excuses such as:
- "Someone hack into my account and greif."
- "My friend played using my account greif."
Will not be taken into account.
You are responsible for your own accounts. Keep your passwords safe, don't share them. If someone greif using your account that's only your fault and your account will be banned for that.
Anyone can destroy a few buildings and then say "That wasn't me".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
I agree to this. All rules should be stated in large writing on the front page, and all rule updates should be listed immediatly. It seems that this server has banned 2 people in one day, both of which are misunderstandings and neither have said a word about "We didn't do it!". Please take this into consideration, both ObiWan and I are new members that did not hear about the instant ban rule and, as a result, both got banned. On the first day.Obiewan1111 wrote:New members that see this post, Keep in mind that you have to read EVERY SINGLE page for new rule updates. Uhh... This was 8+ pages from the initial first page, so if you want people to see this, then it should be on the first page. Plus, your quote just says about people saying it wasn't them. I am agreeing to destroying a few panes of glass, but no, I didn't grief. And I am generally sorry for this misunderstanding.cactuz_pl wrote:To Obiewan1111 and irksomeduck.
Edit: Original post.cactuz_pl wrote:
From now, every confirmed greif will be punish by ban.
Excuses such as:
- "Someone hack into my account and greif."
- "My friend played using my account greif."
Will not be taken into account.
You are responsible for your own accounts. Keep your passwords safe, don't share them. If someone greif using your account that's only your fault and your account will be banned for that.
New members that see this post, Keep in mind that you have to read EVERY SINGLE page for new rule updates. Uhh... This was 8+ pages from the initial first page, so if you want people to see this, then it should be on the first page. Plus, your quote just says about people saying it wasn't them. I am agreeing to destroying a few panes of glass, but no, I didn't grief. And I am generally sorry for this misunderstanding.
My criticism is that each rule should be clearly and concisely presented on the front page, so all new people are able to see it, like myself. Which was the wrong case..
Anyone can destroy a few buildings and then say "That wasn't me".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
"Ignorance of the law does not exempt from its application"
Acquittal would be fair to ignore the players who are in the first place, because without them, this server does not have to make sense.
Redcrab could you add "No mercy law" to the first page?
(If you agree with if, of course. If not, I will unban these players if you want).
My criticism is that each rule should be clearly and concisely presented on the front page, so all new people are able to see it, like myself. Which was the wrong case..
You did greif. I used rollback command, and there is no "We didn't".irksomeduck wrote:I agree to this. All rules should be stated in large writing on the front page, and all rule updates should be listed immediatly. It seems that this server has banned 2 people in one day, both of which are misunderstandings and neither have said a word about "We didn't do it!". Please take this into consideration, both ObiWan and I are new members that did not hear about the instant ban rule and, as a result, both got banned. On the first day.
I agree I griefed, and I apologise. I think you misunderstoodcactuz_pl wrote:You did greif. I used rollback command, and there is no "We didn't".irksomeduck wrote:I agree to this. All rules should be stated in large writing on the front page, and all rule updates should be listed immediatly. It seems that this server has banned 2 people in one day, both of which are misunderstandings and neither have said a word about "We didn't do it!". Please take this into consideration, both ObiWan and I are new members that did not hear about the instant ban rule and, as a result, both got banned. On the first day.
Redcrab please resolve the dispute.
What I meant was that neither of us have denied our actions.irksomeduck wrote:neither have said a word about "We didn't do it!"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests